Tony Wilson, the director of the Institute for Employment Studies, told the Guardian in September that extra support to help disabled people into work should not come with such stringent conditions. “This is simply a cut for those of us who become seriously ill or disabled in the future and need the support of social security, and risks worsening people’s health and pushing them further from work.”Ĭharities have already warned that DWP plans to tighten health-related benefits – which are provided to more than 3 million working-age adults in the UK – could cause “huge anxiety” and mean “sanctions” for disabled people.Ĭampaigners have also said that welfare changes could lead to many losing out on almost £400 a month in support. “There is no evidence to support the idea that there are fully remote jobs available that are suitable for these groups,” she said. Ayla Ozmen, the director of policy and campaigns at the anti-poverty charity Z2K, described the plans as “rushed and ill-thought-out”. There was strong criticism from charities. And if you don’t do this, we will look at sanctions.” But ultimately, you have to engage with that, and that is an obligation on you as a citizen to do this. She added: “It’s saying we’re going to put the right mechanisms around you to help you with that. Those who can work and contribute should contribute.”Įarlier, she told Times Radio the government’s plans were “not just about forcing people out”. Laura Trott, chief secretary to the Treasury, told Sky News: “Of course there should be support for people to help them into work but ultimately there is a duty on citizens if they are able to go out to work they should. Hundreds of thousands of people will be told to look for work that they can do from home or face having their benefits cut by £4,680 a year, under plans that were first reported by the Times.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |